Practice and Procedure

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT & THE REGIONS V MICHAEL JAMES HOLT (2000)

PUBLISHED March 3, 2000
SHARE

Evidence that the defendant was the registered keeper of a vehicle coupled with an adverse inference drawn from the defendant's failure to reply to a notice under s.46 Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 was sufficient to discharge the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove that the defendant was the keeper of the vehicle on the relevant day.

DC (Rose LJ, Alliott J)

03/03/2000

CATEGORIES