In an unsuccessful appeal against a confiscation order, although the onus was on the defendant to prove that the amount of his realisable assets was less than the benefit he had obtained from the offences, it could not be assumed that he had invested the proceeds.

CA (Crim Div) (Judge LJ, Holman J, Andrew Smith J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar