Practice and Procedure
R V GILES FORBES (2000)
PUBLISHED March 24, 2000Where a person imported indecent photographs of children in the belief that he was importing prohibited material, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove that the person knew he was importing indecent material. It was not necessary to prove in particular that the defendant knew that the indecenct material related to children under the age of 16. *Decision upheld by the House of Lords. See R v Forbes (2001) LTL 19/7/2001.
CA (Crim Div) (Rose LJ, Alliott J, Jackson J)
24/03/2000
CATEGORIES
Committee Meeting
Covid-19
In the Media
Law Reform
- Launch of National Pre-Sentence Report before Plea Protocol – 02.11.2020
- Court Users Update from the VPCACD
- The London Criminal Courts Solicitors’s Association Response to the Home Office Consultation Serious Violence Reduction Orders: A New Court Order to Target Known Knife Carriers
- Improvements to the PET and BCM forms in Common Platform
LCCSA News
Legal Aid
Miscellaneous
Practice and Procedure
President's Report
Social Event
- CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October
- LCCSA Summer Party on Thursday 6th July 6:30pm at The Refinery
- LCCSA AGM and Dinner Monday 13th 2023 with Guest Speaker, Stephen Parkinson, the new Director of Public Prosecutions
- “The Lion Who Never Roared” Book Launch 14th November 2023
The London Advocate
Training & Events
Uncategorized
Webinars
- 5SAH Webinar – EncroChat- Practical Steps for a Defence Lawyer – what do we know so far?
- 5SAH – LCCSA – Encrochat Webinar – Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020
- Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code – due to come into force on 1st October 2020
- 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar – The New Sentencing Code – Demystifying Risk Assessments
