The magistrates had been entitled to conclude that the appellant had either used force on the victim or sought to put the victim in fear of being then and there subjected to force and to convict the appellant of robbery contrary to s.8(1) Theft Act 1968.

DC (Rose LJ, Alliott J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar