Practice and Procedure
R v R (2011)
PUBLISHED January 21, 2011[2011] EWCA Crim 542
When relying upon expert evidence in support of applications for adjournment, legal representatives were under a duty to ensure that the expert had been fully apprised of the facts.
CA (Crim Div) (Moses LJ, Kenneth Parker J, Judge Peter Beaumont QC Recorder of London)
21/01/2011
CATEGORIES
Committee Meeting
Covid-19
In the Media
Law Reform
- Launch of National Pre-Sentence Report before Plea Protocol – 02.11.2020
- Court Users Update from the VPCACD
- The London Criminal Courts Solicitors’s Association Response to the Home Office Consultation Serious Violence Reduction Orders: A New Court Order to Target Known Knife Carriers
- Improvements to the PET and BCM forms in Common Platform
LCCSA News
Legal Aid
Miscellaneous
Practice and Procedure
President's Report
Social Event
- CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October
- LCCSA Summer Party on Thursday 6th July 6:30pm at The Refinery
- LCCSA AGM and Dinner Monday 13th 2023 with Guest Speaker, Stephen Parkinson, the new Director of Public Prosecutions
- “The Lion Who Never Roared” Book Launch 14th November 2023
The London Advocate
Training & Events
Uncategorized
Webinars
- 5SAH Webinar – EncroChat- Practical Steps for a Defence Lawyer – what do we know so far?
- 5SAH – LCCSA – Encrochat Webinar – Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020
- Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code – due to come into force on 1st October 2020
- 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar – The New Sentencing Code – Demystifying Risk Assessments
