Practice and Procedure

R v (1) GERALD REARDON (2) MATTHEW SHARMAN (3) PETER RATCLIFF (4) DURGESH MEHTA (2008)

PUBLISHED June 20, 2008
SHARE

[2008] EWCA Crim 1549

There was no basis upon which a decision to exclude an aspect of evidence tendered to discredit a co-defendant to a massive carousel fraud could be considered wrong at law. There was a wealth of other material in the case that was available to the relevant defendant to prove the same point.

CA (Crim Div) (Hughes LJ, Field J, Judge Richard Brown)

20/06/2008

CATEGORIES