Practice and Procedure

BARNARD v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (2011)

PUBLISHED May 24, 2011
SHARE

[2011] EWHC 1648 (Admin)

The Crown Court had erred in reading a pre-sentence report prepared for a magistrates' court before it heard an appeal against conviction. That was prejudicial, or at least appeared to be prejudicial.

DC (Elias LJ, Beatson J)

24/05/2011

CATEGORIES