[2008] EWCA Crim 1923

A judge had not erred, and there was no duplicity, in allowing an amendment to a count in an indictment that had initially alleged rape by vaginal penetration so as to allege that the defendant had raped the victim by penetration either vaginally or anally.

CA (Crim Div) (Latham LJ (VP CA Crim), Grigson J, MacDuff J)

22/07/2008