Practice and Procedure

R v RAFFAEL HUGGINS (2007)

PUBLISHED January 18, 2007
SHARE

[2007] EWCA Crim 732

Where contempt of court had been proven, it did not automatically follow that imprisonment was the appropriate penalty and a judge should always reflect carefully, possibly overnight, on whether or not to imprison the contemnor.

CA (Crim Div) (Moses LJ, Nelson J, Sir Charles Mantell)

18/01/2007

CATEGORIES