[2012] EWCA Crim 1129

A judge had been entitled to reject a defendant's submission of no case to answer, following his charge for an offence of carrying on an unauthorised regulated activity contrary to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 s.19 and s.23, where there had been sufficient evidence on which a jury properly directed could conclude that such activity had taken place by way of business.

CA (Crim Div) (Rafferty LJ, Holman J, Maddison J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar