Where intent to supply was at issue jury should be directed that indirect evidence (cash, drug paraphernalia and lifestyle) was relevant but not to the issue of possession. Obiter: Court of Appeal highlighted the desireability in reconsidering the axiom that such indirect evidence could not be relevant to possession.
CA (Crim Div) (Lord Bingham of Cornhill LCJ, Mantell J, Dyson J)
29/07/1997