Practice and Procedure

CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE v PATRICK ANDERTON JOLLY (2010)

PUBLISHED May 5, 2010
SHARE

[2010] EWHC 1616 (Admin)

When informing a breathalysed driver about his right to request a blood or urine test to replace a breath sample, a police officer was not obliged to provide additional information or ensure that the driver understood the implications or advantages of choosing a blood or urine test instead of a breath test.

DC (Elias LJ, Keith J)

05/05/2010

CATEGORIES