Practice and Procedure

SUSHIL RAWAL V DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (2000)

PUBLISHED March 21, 2000
SHARE

The magistrates, as a reasonable bench properly directing themselves, had been entitled to conclude that there was evidence which enabled them to find that the specimen of blood analysed was that of the defendant and that the defendant had been properly informed of the reason why the intoxilyser was not going to be used.

DC (Kennedy LJ, Butterfield J)

21/03/2000

CATEGORIES