At the appellant's first trial there was no basis for a conviction on a specimen count. Accordingly, the appellant was entitled to a good character direction at his second trial and the failure to agree a formula with regard to character evidence constituted a material irregularity.

CA (Crim Div) (Evans LJ, Sedley J, Hooper J)

24/07/1998

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar