Practice and Procedure

R V NEIL WHITEHOUSE (1999)

PUBLISHED December 7, 1999
SHARE

In an appeal against conviction of 12 months' imprisonment for an offence of doing an act likely to endanger an aircraft or any person therein contrary to art.55 Air Navigation Order 1995, there was no good reason for concluding that the judge's direction was inadequate as to the meaning of whether the appellant's conduct was "likely" to have endangered the aircraft or its passengers and accordingly the appeal was dismissed.

CA (Crim Div) (Pill LJ, Rougier J, Morison J)

07/12/1999

CATEGORIES