In an appeal against conviction of 12 months' imprisonment for an offence of doing an act likely to endanger an aircraft or any person therein contrary to art.55 Air Navigation Order 1995, there was no good reason for concluding that the judge's direction was inadequate as to the meaning of whether the appellant's conduct was "likely" to have endangered the aircraft or its passengers and accordingly the appeal was dismissed.

CA (Crim Div) (Pill LJ, Rougier J, Morison J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar