The appellant's conviction for making an indecent photograph of a child and possessing indecent photographs of children was unsafe in circumstances where the jury were given no adequate explanation of the significance of evidence of propensity adduced by the Crown, and such evidence should have been excluded as it was not relevant to any respect to the charges the appellant was facing.

[2005] EWCA Crim 1284

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar