Appeals against mugging convictions where judge had permitted statements of doctors who had examined the victims, to be read & refused to insist that the makers be called
CA (Crim Div)
Leave a Comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Next post: LODWICK V JONES (1982)
Previous post: R V PERVEZ & KHAN (1982)
Timely webcasts, analysis, updates and presentations about criminal law, practice and procedure. This channel allows listeners to learn about cutting-edge issues from leading practitioners and other professionals involved in criminal litigation.
Search the Archives
View Content by Category