Practice and Procedure

R v DAMIEN CADOGAN (2013)

PUBLISHED October 4, 2013
SHARE

The admission of certain evidence in relation to an offence of conspiracy to provide heroin, including evidence of traces of cocaine at the accused's house and a covert conversation between alleged co-conspirators, had not rendered the consequent conviction unsafe. The judge's clear directions to the jury in relation to that evidence meant that the offender had not been prejudiced by its admission.

CA (Crim Div) (Hallett LJ, Saunders J, Judge Zeidman QC)

04/10/2013

CATEGORIES