Practice and Procedure

R v ABDUL RAHMAN SAIK (2006)

PUBLISHED May 3, 2006
SHARE

A defendant would not be guilty of conspiracy to commit the substantive offence of money laundering where he did not know, and therefore did not intend, that the money which he had agreed to convert would be the proceeds of crime when at a date in the future he performed his part of the agreement with his co-conspirators. Reasonable grounds for suspicion were sufficient for the substantive offence but not for conspiracy.

[2006] UKHL 18

CATEGORIES