[2013] EWCA Crim 657

In confiscation proceedings following money laundering offences, a judge had been entitled to conclude that a husband and wife had hidden assets and that there was no indication that those assets were less than the benefit sums calculated in the orders. Further, the wife had failed to show that her shop had provided an additional legitimate income that accounted for the unexplained credits to her accounts.

CA (Crim Div) (Hughes LJ, Cranston J, Judge Radford)

20/03/2013