In the circumstances, a fair-minded and informed observer would have concluded that there wasn't a real possibility of a judge being bias where he had acted as a legal member of a mental health review tribunal after he had previously sentenced the restricted patient to the sentence that was being reviewed.

[2005] EWHC 2791 (Admin)

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar