Practice and Procedure

R (on the application of M) v MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW TEAM (2005)

PUBLISHED December 15, 2005

In the circumstances, a fair-minded and informed observer would have concluded that there wasn't a real possibility of a judge being bias where he had acted as a legal member of a mental health review tribunal after he had previously sentenced the restricted patient to the sentence that was being reviewed.

[2005] EWHC 2791 (Admin)