It was incorrect that similar fact evidence was only admissible in a civil suit if it was likely to be reasonably conclusive of a primary issue in the proceedings or alternatively if it had enhanced relevance so as to have substantial probative value. The correct test was whether the evidence was potentially probative in the proceedings.

[2005] UKHL 26

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar