[2009] EWCA Crim 220

A conviction for exposure was upheld as although there were discrepancies in the complainant's identity evidence, it was not a fleeting glance identity case as she had seen the offender in good light for a significant time and the judge had dealt with the discrepancies sufficiently, it being not unknown for witnesses to have difficulty in describing a person whom they subsequently correctly identified.

CA (Crim Div) (Stanley Burnton LJ, Treacy J, Slade J)

10/02/2009