[2013] EWCA Crim 74

A judge had not misdirected a jury by failing to say that if they accepted a detainee's reasons for giving a "no comment" interview, namely because his preferred solicitor was unavailable, they could not draw adverse inferences from his failure to answer questions.

CA (Crim Div) (Treacy LJ, Edwards-Stuart J, Sir Geoffrey Grigson)

22/01/2013