A trial judge had erred in law by directing the jury that it could deploy inadmissible material, the source of which was a co-accused advancing a cut-throat defence, in considering the guilt or otherwise of the appellant.

CA (Crim Div) (Moses LJ, Hedley J, Recorder of Preston)

05/02/2009

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar