Practice and Procedure
R v BRISTOL MAGISTRATES' COURT (DEFENDANT) HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE (INTERESTED PARTY), EX PARTE JUNTTAN OY (A COMPANY) (2002)
PUBLISHED March 19, 2002[2002] EWHC 566 (Admin)
It was inappropriate and wrong for the Health and Safety Executive to prosecute under s.6 Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 when there was an offence under the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 SI 1992/3037 covering exactly the same ground in different language and imposing a different penalty. * Leave to appeal to the House of Lords granted.
DC (Wright J, Lord Woolf of Barnes LCJ)
19/03/2002
CATEGORIES
Committee Meeting
Covid-19
In the Media
Law Reform
- Launch of National Pre-Sentence Report before Plea Protocol – 02.11.2020
- Court Users Update from the VPCACD
- The London Criminal Courts Solicitors’s Association Response to the Home Office Consultation Serious Violence Reduction Orders: A New Court Order to Target Known Knife Carriers
- Improvements to the PET and BCM forms in Common Platform
LCCSA News
Legal Aid
Miscellaneous
Practice and Procedure
President's Report
Social Event
- CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October
- LCCSA Summer Party on Thursday 6th July 6:30pm at The Refinery
- LCCSA AGM and Dinner Monday 13th 2023 with Guest Speaker, Stephen Parkinson, the new Director of Public Prosecutions
- “The Lion Who Never Roared” Book Launch 14th November 2023
The London Advocate
Training & Events
Uncategorized
Webinars
- 5SAH Webinar – EncroChat- Practical Steps for a Defence Lawyer – what do we know so far?
- 5SAH – LCCSA – Encrochat Webinar – Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020
- Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code – due to come into force on 1st October 2020
- 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar – The New Sentencing Code – Demystifying Risk Assessments
