It was inappropriate to give a direction that an adverse inference could be drawn from a failure to mention a defence at an interview under caution and to invite the jury to consider that the defence was recently invented in circumstances where the defence had already been raised prior to the interview.

[2005] EWCA Crim 3540

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar