It was for the court to analyse the evidence and to be satisfied that a dog was dangerous in the sense that it had a dangerous disposition. It could be considered dangerous for the purposes of s.2 Dogs Act even if it only posed a threat to other dogs as opposed to humans or livestock.

DC (Brooke LJ, Sedley J)

07/10/1998

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar