Practice and Procedure

WAYNE HUNTLEY V DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (2004)

PUBLISHED April 2, 2004
SHARE

[2004] EWHC 870 (Admin)

Where the only evidence before justices was that the appellant had been arrested on suspicion of driving with excess alcohol, the conviction would be set aside since a suspicion of driving was not sufficient to prove to the requisite standard that he had actually been driving.

QBD (Admin) (Owen J)

02/04/2004

CATEGORIES