Practice and Procedure

STEPHEN ALAN MORGANS v SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT sub nom MORGANS v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (2000)

PUBLISHED February 17, 2000
SHARE

Evidence of material obtained by the persons identified in s.9(2) Interception of Communications Act 1985 of communications of the kind described in s.1(1), except for the purposes of s.1(3), would always be inadmissible. R v Rasool (1997) 1 WLR 1092 and R v Owen (1999) 1 WLR 949 overruled.

HL (Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord Steyn, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Clyde)

17/02/2000

CATEGORIES