Practice and Procedure

SAMUDA (Appellant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES' COURT (Respondent) & DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (Interested Party) (2008)

PUBLISHED January 29, 2008
SHARE

[2008] EWHC 205 (Admin)

Where a district judge had intended to vary an antisocial behaviour order but had failed to so it was appropriate for the High Court to exercise its powers under the Supreme Court Act 1981 s.28A and vary the order.

DC (Moses LJ, Sullivan J)

29/01/2008

CATEGORIES