Where a jury had been told on a number of occasions of the inadmissibility and irrelevance regarding anything said by one defendant that might have appeared to have implicated a co-defendant, the jury must have appreciated that the warning applied directly to a third party's statements regarding a defendant's admissions as they did to that defendant's interviews.

CA (Crim Div) (Mance LJ, Douglas Brown J, Sachs J)

23/03/2000