Practice and Procedure

R V RUPAL PATEL (2006)

PUBLISHED October 25, 2006
SHARE

[2006] EWCA Crim 2689

The defendant had not made a false representation when answering no to a question on an employment application form which asked her whether she had ever been convicted of an offence in circumstances where she had previously been conditionally discharged in respect of a shoplifting offence, since a conditional discharge was not to be regarded as a conviction.

CA (Crim Div) (Hughes LJ, Henriques J, Field J)

25/10/2006

CATEGORIES