A judge had not erred in deciding it was appropriate to make a confiscation order against the appellant taking into account the gift to a third party of his half-interest in a matrimonial home. However, the judge had erred in determining the value of the gift by reference to the net equity in the property purchased after sale of the home.

[2005] EWCA Crim 205

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar