Practice and Procedure

R v MAHAMED RASHID ISMAIL MEMI (2007)

PUBLISHED November 30, 2007
SHARE

On the facts, a jury had been entitled to find that an offender was guilty of one offence but not another which allegedly occurred at the same time as there was neither anything illogical about such a conclusion nor any inconsistency between the two verdicts.

CA (Crim Div) (Keene LJ, Burton J, Bell J)

30/11/2007

CATEGORIES