Practice and Procedure

R v DANIEL JONATHAN SHANKLY (2004)

PUBLISHED May 7, 2004
SHARE

[2004] EWCA Crim 1224

The judge in a murder trial had been right to reject a submission that there was no sufficient case to go before the jury in circumstances where there was considerable circumstantial evidence, at least some of which could be relevant on the question of how the fire that caused the fatality had started.

CA (Crim Div) (Pill LJ, Keith J, Sir Charles Mantell)

07/05/2004

CATEGORIES