False bills of lading transmitted by facsimile was considered a duplicate of the original document. The relevant question was what the appellant intended at the time of making the false instruments not what he intended to do thereafter.

CA (Crim Div) (Judge LJ, Smith J, Judge Rant QC)

29/10/1997

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar