Practice and Procedure

R v (1) MARK JOHN GOLIGHTLY (2) DAVID THOMAS GOLIGHTLY (2009)

PUBLISHED January 26, 2009
SHARE

[2009] EWCA Crim 150

It was important that those representing defendants on the merits of an appeal against conviction stood back and took a robust view of the case, subjecting their perceived grounds to rigorous analysis, and arguing against themselves to satisfy themselves that the grounds were properly arguable. That was particularly so when the focus of the appeal was about alleged omissions and errors in the summing up.

CA (Crim Div) (Moses LJ, Dobbs J, Griffith Williams J)

26/01/2009

CATEGORIES