Practice and Procedure

R (on the application of TAYLOR) (Claimant) v SOUTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES' COURT (Defendant) & CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (Interested Party) (2008)

PUBLISHED November 18, 2008

[2008] EWHC 3006 (Admin)

There was no basis for interfering with the district judge's decision to adjourn the trial of the defendant after close of the evidence in order to allow the prosecution to deal with a highly technical point regarding the alleged non-service of the notice of intended prosecution.

DC (Toulson LJ, Forbes J)