It was at least arguable that the asylum adjudicator in the instant case had erred in law by failing to set out cogent reasons why he preferred part of the evidence as to the in-country position in Serbia over other evidence, and accordingly the matter was remitted to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal for a fresh determination of the respondent's appeal.

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar