Where a defendant had deceived a victim into parting with property in the belief that the defendant would pay the victim's existing liability to a finance company on that property then the correct particulars of the offence would be against the victim and not the finance company.

CA (Crim Div) (Beldam LJ, Garland J, Longmore J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar