Whether judge wrong to admit evidence of conversations between the alleged drug smugglers and customs officers before a caution was administered. Whether subsequent interviews had been tainted by the lack of caution. Even if the conversations and interviews should have been excluded, whether the convictions still safe.

CA (Crim Div) (Otton LJ, Wright J, Dyson J)

03/04/1998

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar