Where a unanimous verdict direction had not been given and the clerk's question for the verdict was unambiguous then it was for the defence to satisfy the court that there was a real possibility that the jury had convicted on a majority.

CA (Crim Div) (Henry LJ, Sir Patrick Russell, Judge Beaumont QC)

14/07/1998

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar