Convictions for indecency were quashed on appeal because the complainants did not mention their complaints when interviewed by a psychiatrist, whose report was known to the defence but not relied upon until appeal.

CA (Crim Div) (Waller LJ, Johnson J, Latham J)

19/11/1999

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar