Practice and Procedure

R v MICHAEL HAROLD JAMES (2005)

PUBLISHED January 24, 2005
SHARE

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 Sch.2 para.3 did not enable any prior alleged consistent statement to be adduced in evidence, rather the admission of such evidence depended on the circumstances in which the statement came to be made and in which it was sought to be adduced.

[2005] EWCA Crim 110

CATEGORIES