[2010] EWCA Crim 95

A conviction for burglary was unsafe where the only evidence against the defendant had been a fingerprint but it had become apparent after the trial that the fingerprint could not be attributed to the part of the premises which had been burgled.

CA (Crim Div) (Pill LJ, Bennett J, Field J)

20/01/2010

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Next post:

Previous post:

Skip to toolbar