Judge's error in directing jury that evidence with no corroborative value would confirm credibility of prosecution witness : Telephone calls between suspects : Excluding recorded conversation as unfair in rape case : Admitting recorded conversation in conspiracy trial although element of entrapment present-"every case is different"

CA (Crim Div) (Watkins LJ, Auld J, Tudor Evans J)

02/10/1989

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar