Practice and Procedure

R v CARL LAYNE (2006)

PUBLISHED November 27, 2006
SHARE

[2006] EWCA Crim 3318

A judge had been correct to rule that a trial could continue in a defendant's absence where it was clear he had voluntarily absconded and therefore waived his right to stay proceedings.

CA (Crim Div) (Laws LJ, Royce J, Judge Elgan Edwards)

27/11/2006

CATEGORIES