[2001] EWCA Crim 1829

There was no fault in either the judge's decision not to exclude evidence obtained by means of intrusive surveillance devices, pursuant to s.78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, or in declining to order further disclosure by the prosecution. Furthermore, there was no fault in refusing to stay the proceedings on the grounds of abuse of process. Consequently the appeals were dismissed.

CA (Crim Div) (Potter LJ, Tomlinson J, Roderick Evans J)

03/08/2001