Practice and Procedure
NASH v BIRMINGHAM CROWN COURT (2005)
PUBLISHED February 18, 2005In order to comply with Magistrates' Courts Rules 1981 r.100 a person charged with an offence contrary to the Protection of Animals Act 1911 s. 1(1)(a) was entitled to know what specific act or omission, alleged to have caused suffering to an animal, he was charged with.
[2005] EWHC 338 (Admin)
CATEGORIES
Committee Meeting
Covid-19
In the Media
Law Reform
LCCSA News
Legal Aid
Miscellaneous
Practice and Procedure
President's Report
Social Event
- CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October
- LCCSA Summer Party on Thursday 6th July 6:30pm at The Refinery
- LCCSA AGM and Dinner Monday 13th 2023 with Guest Speaker, Stephen Parkinson, the new Director of Public Prosecutions
- “The Lion Who Never Roared” Book Launch 14th November 2023
The London Advocate
Training & Events
Uncategorized
Webinars
- 5SAH – LCCSA – Encrochat Webinar – Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020
- Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code – due to come into force on 1st October 2020
- 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar – The New Sentencing Code – Demystifying Risk Assessments
- The New Sentencing Code – Demystifying Risk Assessments and other Tips
